| Invites, Announcements, & Programs Tips and advice on addressing, wording, and assembling Invitations, Announcements, Programs and more. |
|
View Poll Results: Which pic would you use on the invites?
|
|
1
|
   
|
15 |
83.33% |
|
2
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
3
|
  
|
2 |
11.11% |
|
4
|
  
|
2 |
11.11% |
|
5
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
07-17-2006, 12:43 AM
|
 |
Average Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 970
|
|
Which Pic? again...
Ok so my sister took a couple shots that turned out good. And I dug up one that was done professionally, though I really didn't want to use one that posed. Still not sure but any feed back would be good. I don't know why but this is really starting to stress me out.
1 - 
2 - 
3 - 
4 - 
5 - 
|
07-17-2006, 01:54 AM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Wedding Date: June 17, 2006
Posts: 4,129
|
|
I LOVE #3, and if your picture is going to be under vellum, you wouldn't even notice it was a little blurry. But I think it makes it look a little whimsical myself.  And you both look relaxed in that one too.
|
07-17-2006, 02:02 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New York
Wedding Date: April 17, 2004
Posts: 14,018
|
|
I love pics 1 and 3! I don't think the others are bad, it's just that those are really, really nice. 
__________________
================================
A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory.
|
07-17-2006, 02:09 AM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Just outside Glasgow, Scotland.
Posts: 4,968
|
|
I'd either use #1 or #5. I voted for 1 though...
I wouldn't personally use 3, just in case anyone wanted to keep the photo of the two of you, then took apart the invite to discover it was blurry 
(BTW Your eyes look very pretty in #2 )
__________________
|
07-17-2006, 02:25 AM
|
|
Average Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 970
|
|
Ah Ann I see your point, and I could definitely see some of our guest doing that then being disappointed.
And thank you!
|
07-17-2006, 02:45 AM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
Posts: 3,485
|
|
I think #1, but I like # 3 and 4 too, I think they are relaxed and cute. But I think #1 will be best.
__________________
Josh and Suzanne married July 23, 2005
"Remember that happiness is a way of travel, not a destination."
-- Roy Goodman
|
07-17-2006, 03:25 AM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 3,356
|
|
I like #1 & #5. I voted #1!!! 
__________________
130 pounds down
|
07-17-2006, 04:09 AM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,639
|
|
Much better. I'd go for 3 except it is slightly blurry, so I voted for #1. It looks well done, but not stiff.
__________________
Wynelle
author of Under the Liberty Oak, available at www.Amazon.com, Nominated for Best First Book 2007 by the Georgia Writers Association!
<
|
07-17-2006, 01:15 PM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Wedding Date: 5-6-06
Posts: 6,354
|
|
I vote for #1 also!
|
07-17-2006, 02:58 PM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: gorgeous, historic St. Augustine FL!
Posts: 2,194
|
|
Vote went to #1 too but I like 3 as well; you could put it in photoshop and try and clean it up a little - that way it LOOKS like it was done on purpose!
__________________
www.ImmortalChild.blogspot.com
Writing is an excerise attempted only by the truly insane. --me
June 20, 2007: 2 hearts joined as one.
|
07-17-2006, 03:58 PM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,478
|
|
1 and 3 is nice, but i like #4 because it looks natural and playful.
|
07-17-2006, 04:48 PM
|
|
Average Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 970
|
|
Number 3 has already been photoshopped. I think we're going to go ahead and go with 1 for the invites and may use 3 as a watermark on programs since the blurriness really won't matter there.
|
07-17-2006, 05:26 PM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montgomery, Alabama
Posts: 3,307
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kenzies_mama
Number 3 has already been photoshopped. I think we're going to go ahead and go with 1 for the invites and may use 3 as a watermark on programs since the blurriness really won't matter there.
|
Sounds like a winning plan to me.
__________________
|
07-17-2006, 05:32 PM
|
|
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Just outside Glasgow, Scotland.
Posts: 4,968
|
|
So if #3 was photoshop-ed, does your sis still have the original?
If she used motional blur on it then it might have been fine before...
__________________
|
07-17-2006, 05:39 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,971
|
|
I voted for #1. #5 looks like you're pushing him away.
__________________
Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn.
|
08-11-2006, 05:53 AM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cheyenne Wyoming
Wedding Date: May 9th 2009
Posts: 4,008
|
|
I know the pole is closed now, but I reall like #1 closely followed by 5 then 2.
|
08-11-2006, 03:12 PM
|
|
Average Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 970
|
|
We used 1 as soon as I stop being lazy I'll get a pic of it up on here.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:31 PM.
|
|
