| Beauty & Health Discuss wedding day beauty & health tips. |
03-16-2006, 07:33 PM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 3,356
|
|
Had me thinking about hair
ok ladies.... you had me thinking about what kind of hairstyle for my wedding. I found these pictures...let me know what you think.
or this one:
__________________
130 pounds down
|
03-16-2006, 07:37 PM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montgomery, Alabama
Posts: 3,307
|
|
I like the second one, but add the tendrils around your face like in the first. (I personally, have a thing against the piled on top of the head look.)
__________________
|
03-16-2006, 07:40 PM
|
|
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,876
|
|
the second one. The first is too much to me.
|
03-16-2006, 07:41 PM
|
 |
Average Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 849
|
|
It depends on your veil...but I like the second one too!
__________________
|
03-16-2006, 07:50 PM
|
|
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 3,356
|
|
I might not do the veil thing. I am not sure yet. I like Lizbet idea. 
__________________
130 pounds down
|
03-16-2006, 07:55 PM
|
|
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,971
|
|
Eh. Neither one is really my cup o' tea.  They're both a little "much" and over-done for my taste. I mean, if the hair is higher than one-third of the length of one's face, it's way too much IMO! LOL! That's just my personal rule of thumb!  Both of these brides have 2/3 a face-length of hair going!
|
03-16-2006, 07:59 PM
|
|
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montgomery, Alabama
Posts: 3,307
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Marrying_the_Good_Husband
Both of these brides have 2/3 a face-length of hair going!
|
Actually the second pic isn't much higher than the crown of her head. It just looks higher because of the angle at which the pic is taken. You would see more of a backwards curl than an upward curl if she were looking straight ahead.
__________________
|
03-16-2006, 07:59 PM
|
|
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,876
|
|
See the second one looks like her pile o' hair is on the back/top of her head. The first one looks like she's got a mound on TOP of her head.
|
03-16-2006, 08:10 PM
|
|
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,971
|
|
I should add that I have a special "sensitivity" to big hair being from NJ. We've gotten a bad rap as the "big hair state"/"Jersey girl" stereotype (since the 80s) so I try to avoid it at all costs!  So, it's just a personal preference!
|
03-16-2006, 08:11 PM
|
|
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 3,356
|
|
I understand! I need something on top my head. I dont want flat hair that day. I am really liking the second one better. I think her hair is more towards the back of her head than piled on top.
__________________
130 pounds down
|
03-16-2006, 08:27 PM
|
|
Average Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 849
|
|
I thought Texas had that reputation. We see some one with "Big Texas Hair" and we call them out!
__________________
|
03-16-2006, 11:14 PM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Wedding Date: 5-6-06
Posts: 6,354
|
|
I like the 1st one my self. sorry Try both of them ahead of time and see what u like best.
|
03-16-2006, 11:29 PM
|
 |
Advanced Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
Posts: 3,485
|
|
I like the first one better.. I think its because its softer around the face. I think the second one would be good if you did what Liz suggested and make it softer around your face...
__________________
Josh and Suzanne married July 23, 2005
"Remember that happiness is a way of travel, not a destination."
-- Roy Goodman
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04 PM.
|
|
